Author’s practical guidance
You need ten minutes on it and they will not let you
Source named in the book: research on early language and conversational turns (Hirsh-Pasek)
You are allowed to use it.
Say this now
“I need this for five minutes. Then I'm yours.”
A reason and an end. Then keep the end.
“That's finished. What were you making?”
The return, named. It is what makes the leaving cheap.
Do this
- Say what it is for — work, a message, the shopping list — in three words.
- Give it an end and keep it, because a broken return is what stops them believing you.
- Come back with a question about what they were doing rather than a general reappearance.
- Do it in one block, not in pieces.
- Let them see you finish and put it down. The visible ending does most of the work.
Avoid this
- Sneaking it and hoping it goes unnoticed. It is noticed, and unexplained is the expensive part.
- Apologizing for using it at all. You do not owe a three-year-old an apology for working.
- "I'm not on my phone." You are. They can see it.
If it repeats
If they escalate every time you pick it up, shorten the block rather than hiding it. Two minutes kept exactly is worth more than ten minutes announced and overrun, and the keeping is what they are actually testing.
Why the book suggests this
You are allowed to use it. What a small child cannot do is work out why you have gone, and an adult who is silently absent is more confusing than an adult who says what they are doing and when they will be back.
The thing worth protecting is the number of back-and-forth exchanges between you across a day, which is what the research on early language keeps pointing at. A narrated, bounded absence removes far fewer of those than a vague one, because both of you know when it ends.
Related prepared situations
What happened next?
From this collection
Same Words: Every Screen
45 prepared situations in this family area.