Author’s practical guidance
Carrying something breakable
Source named in the book: Montessori · self-efficacy research (Bandura)
Handing a three-year-old a glass jug is uncomfortable, which is exactly what makes it useful.
Say this now
“Two hands. Walk.”
Two instructions, both physical, both possible. Nothing about being careful.
“It broke. Get the brush and we'll clear it up.”
The response to a breakage decides whether they carry anything next week.
Do this
- Start with something real but cheap: a small glass, a china saucer.
- Make the distance short at first and lengthen it over weeks.
- Keep a dustpan where they can reach it, so clearing up is part of the job rather than a punishment.
- Say nothing while they are carrying. The commentary is what causes the drop.
- Do not withdraw the task after a breakage. Withdrawing it is the only way to guarantee no learning.
Avoid this
- Giving them only unbreakable versions and then complaining that they are rough with things.
- Hovering with your hands out the entire way across the room.
- "Careful, that's expensive!" — attaches money to a task they cannot price.
If it repeats
At two, short distances with both hands and a lot of breakage. By three and a half most children can carry a full glass across a room. By five it is unremarkable — in households where they were allowed to practice on things that could break.
Why the book suggests this
Handing a three-year-old a glass jug is uncomfortable, which is exactly what makes it useful. Everything they usually carry is unbreakable, so nothing they carry has ever required care — and care is only learned on objects that can actually be damaged.
Montessori built this into the classroom deliberately: real glass, real china, at child size. Not because breakage does not happen, but because the possibility of it is the whole lesson. Plastic teaches nothing, kindly.
Related prepared situations
What happened next?
From this collection
Same Words: Big Skills
45 prepared situations in this family area.